The WSOP Extension

  • 5-3-2008

WDIAV Online Poker FreerollOn May the 1st, Harrah's announced what I think is the biggest change in WSOP history. They extended the WSOP, not in number of days, but in when the final table of the Main Event will be taking place.

When you get to the final 9 players this year, those chips will be bagged up as usual and the players will go home for the night, thinking of the possibility of becoming the 2008 World Series of Poker Champion. That’s when history ends and a new era begins. Nine players will then have to wait till November 9th and 10th to play it out.

This decision, which was made by the powers that be at the World Series of Poker and in my opinion with strong urging by ESPN, will have both positive and negative effects.

The players committee which consists of TOP name players all gave their blessing and it’s no wonder, should one of them make the final table, it would mean a ton of $$ compared to the average guy getting there.

To see how the masses feel about the change, it’s easy to see that there are many on both sides of the fence, albeit from what I’ve read; more negative than positive. For a true sampling, look at the many poker forums around the world.

This article is my first thoughts on the subject as it just came to light, so I’m sure I’ll think of more as time passes, but in the meantime, let me start with the positives.

During that 4 month period of time:

Players will get the equivalent of 9th place $$ to spend over the 4 months, this will allow then to play in other events that are high profile and get endorsement $$

Players will get more notoriety (15 minutes of fame extended)

Players will probably get more $$ to wear ‘logo-gear”, which I don’t take lightly and there will probably be tons of $$ for the waiting participants wearing gear as ESPN chronicles there life.

Players will get a break from the 7 day journey that gets them to the FT

There are plenty more positives, but:

What happens when players have 4 months to make a deal?

As a Pro, I count on the fact that I’ve been at 100 final tables in my career and the FT of a big event isn’t something you get a chance to practice. What happens when players can get expert coaching and now have the 9th place money to pay for it?

What happens when players get a chance to watch the first 7 days of the WSOP broadcast, setting up their final table play?

What happens to the tradition of finishing the final table with no break in-between, the gruel being the time honored tradition?

Does this time allow for impropriety, you bet!

Does this time allow for strong arm influence, you bet!

What do you think of the final table playing down to 2 on the 9th and then heads up play on the 10th. What if one hand decides it all, or after they lose 7 players the chip count is 95% to 5%? You may think I’m crazy, but what happens when someone dies during those 4 months? Some year that’s going to happen, then what, take his chips out of play? Will that player be blinded off?

I can imagine a scenario where the player who has died is awarded 9th place and the family of the player sues Harrah’s for 8 million dollars.

No my friends this is just another case of Harrah’s/ESPN wins and the poker players who without whom there’d be no WSOP are once again with their hands tied.

Just my first thoughts and my humble opinion

Comments (1)

Said this on 5-11-2008 At 04:19 pm
This is the first I have heard of this new development and I'm stunned. The only positive I see is that it MAYBE avoids knowing ahead of time who wins it all prior to watching on ESPN. Of course, that depends on how ESPN handles the FT television broadcast. We still will find it hard to avoid knowing who makes it to the FT. It's like that Seinfeld episode where Jerry videos a Mets game and tries not to have someone tip him off to the outcome prior to watching it. I love watching the WSOP on ESPN, but knowing the eventual winner sometimes takes some of the excitement out of the individual hands. Last year, I read that Jerry Yang (who?!) won. While watching, I unfortunately knew who was going to win when he was all-in. Still fun to watch, but takes something out of the excitement quotient.
But will this delay change anything in this regard? They would have to find a way to broadcast live. I'm willing to watch that much Poker, but I'm sure I'm in a minority. And could ESPN devote the time or generate the advertising sales to undertake such a bold venture? Probably not. I'll watch as always, but I may not like it.
Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message: