Checkraising to Induce a Bluff

Las Vegas discount CouponsCheck raising is one of the first tools every player learns, from the idea of checking when you are weak to betting when you are strong.  In this case, however, you check when you are really strong and then, when your opponent stabs at the pot, raise him massively.  How can we extract the most from this tool, especially in the hurly burly of the online poker field, with its share of people labeled as "calling stations" to elephants, jackals, bluffers, and lions?  As is well documented in poker books and other literature, the primary skill separating the beginner poker player from the intermediate is "reading ability," and this encompasses the ability to smell out weaknesses in a players continuation bet, perceiving when a so-called check-raise is really a bluff, or when a player is checking a monster.  While this can only be gained through experience, here are a few pointers that rely on check-raising, to help the beginner.  

It is often a good idea to check the flop to an aggressive player, to see where you stand.  While this may seem counter-intuitive, violating Greenstein's concept of defining your hand when you flop something by betting out or checking when you are weak, it is actually a very powerful concept.  Based on the aggressive player's reaction, including such vital tells as how quickly he bets, what size his bet his, and how his betting patterns fit in with his past hand history, as well as, above all, the texture of the flop, you can gauge exactly where he stands.  You should initially put him on a range of hands, based on his past history and his pre-flop behavior at the table, and then, analyze how these hands, derived from Harrington's "Structured Hand Analysis," or SHAL, would connect with the flop.  You should analyze how a player would frequently bluff at a rag-rag-rag-flop, based on what his preflop holding was.  For example, if you hold pocket 7s on a flop of 10-8-2, and your opponent comes out betting after raising preflop, and you can categorize him as a loose-aggressive type player who frequently takes stabs at pots, you can probably put him on a bluff since this fits in with his pattern of loose-aggressive, continuation-type betting after the flop, and put in a massive raise to see where you stand, since he almost certainly holds two unpaired high cards based on his moderate raising.  This system of play requires very sophisticated reading skills and so can not really be recommended to beginners, but its skills are still accessible to inexperienced poker players.  Above all, the inexperienced player should remember that 66% of hands miss the flop completely, and so when a loose-aggressive jackal is continuation-betting after every flop, you should pick your spots, and sometimes check to him when you think you have the best hand, based on your analysis of his likely preflop behavior and, most importantly, the texture of the flop.  When he puts out a continuation bet, you can sometimes place him on a bluff based on your read of him, and check-raise him, making him think that you are just making a stab the pot without a legitimate hand.  When this ensues with a raising war, you can sometimes profit in spades.  

As a final example, here is a hand from the WDIAV online poker freeroll that I busted administrator “Arnoldo” with using the above system: I raised 3 times the big blind with a suited Ace King, and he, after pausing a few moments, called my raise.  Based on his history, I put him on a weak King of Queen, such as K-J, K-10, Q-J, Q-10, or possibly A-10 or A-J.  The flop came 2-9-Q, with one heart.  Since I had the redraw to the nut flush and two over cards, I led out with a continuation bet of 3.5 times the big blind, which was called instantly. This led me to believe, based on his perception of my table image as loose aggressive, that he had nothing...the card on the turn came the K of diamonds, giving me top pair, top kicker.  I decided to trap him, based on his preflop holding of likely a weak King or Queen, or a A-10 or A-J, so I checked to him, deciding to camouflage my hit on the turn with the mien of a failed continuation bet that was checking to avoid further bluffed losses.  He bet a third of his remaining stack, and based on my read of him as having a weak King or Queen, or possibly A-10, and his perception of my image as a failed continuation better who was now checking to prevent further bluffed losses, I check-raised all-in, which he went all-in.  He turned over K-10, and with a Queen on the river I took down a large pot in the process of knocking him out.  Thus, my read here based on his preflop calling range and my subsequent trap based on my loose-aggressive table image and a check-raise all-in, led to a successful takedown of pot.

PartyPoker.com



Comments (0)

Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message: